1788-07-05 (static/transcriptions/1788/07/155.jpg)

Most agreeable to the evidence, there being no positive proof that the Godown was actually broken, was also recommended to the Jury for another reason namely that the word burglariously being omitted that Count could not be maintained as an Indictment for Burglary. It might be added that the fact is laid to have been committed in a house, and the proof was that the goods were stolen out of a shop or godown.