1788-12-04 (static/transcriptions/1788/12/163.jpg)

In some Cases, even for a Tresspass, a Bill is proper enough in a Court of Equity, viz where by the [ill] Contrivance of it, it cannot easily be provd. As if a Man in his own Ground digs a way under ground to my Mineral, and the like. So in Case of a Bill by the East India Company for a Discovery, and to prevent an Interloper Trading to the East Indies, there is a great difficulty as to the Prog[ill] , the Matter for the greatest part having been transacted in the East-Indies, and therefore the Plaintiff setting forth, that they were willing to wave the Forfeiture, shall have a Discovery. So where the Charge is not by way of Tresspass, but under Colour of Title, as [ill] defendant by [ill] of Sequestration by the Committee, had seizd several Tithes, [ill] due to Plaintiff, the Plaintiff may pray a discovery of the particulars so taken, and their value. So where a Man by Colorer of a Title enters into an House, [ill] and possesses himself of the Goods, [ill] for it may be impossible for the Plaintiff to discover the particulars without
such