1781-01-29 (static/transcriptions/1781/01/024.jpg)

William Young
v
William Bondfeild.
An Action which had been heard on
now came on for Argument on the Evidence.
The objection formerly taken by Mr. Fay that the Insurance was void by the Statute of
because the Interest was respondentia and was not so named, was not now insisted on.
Mr. Newman, For the Defendant, now insisted on.
Mr. Newman, For the Defendant, now insisted that the Plaintiff had no Interest but a Respondentia Interest which was due when the Ship arrived
/ at