1781-02-06 (static/transcriptions/1781/02/014.jpg)

6)

Sum in the bond given by Sheilds to Gordon, if they insisted the consideration of that bond was usurious, being for twenty five per Cent on a Sum lent as so much insured to be Gordon’s Share of a Profit on Trading with that Sum. But it did not appear they were agents for Mrs. Mappletoft. It did not appear Mr. Jarrett was Attorney for both Plaintiffs and Defendant in the Action brought by Holland Hunter and Hunter against Mappletoft Executrix of Sheilds, but on the Contrary, the Warrant of Attorney to appear and defend for Mrs. Sarah Mappletoft was produced in which it appear’d Mr. William Jackson was Attorney for
Mrs.