1781-02-06 (static/transcriptions/1781/02/011.jpg)

(3
([Tuesday] Feb. 6th 1781.)

as Attorney for Holland and Hunter.
The Plaintiffs insisted they were intituled to recover this Money from the Defendants, because the Defendants had only a judgment for a Simple Contract Debt, which was obtain’d after they had notice of a judgment obtain’d by the Plaintiffs for a Debt of an higher nature, that is on a Bond.
But the Court agreed in pronouncing judgment for the Defendants, because they were not of opinion, there was any obligation on the Defendants when money arising from the effects of Sheilds came to their hands, to pay it, in discharge of the judgment for the Bond Debt, but they were at liberty
/ to