1791-10-31 (static/transcriptions/1791/10/090.jpg)

52.)

part of the Timber; notwithstanding the Appellant after the death of the said Francis Peacock, not an Agent into the Purnea & Morning Countries to take Charge of, and conduct the partnership Affairs who found several large Quantities of Timber which had been felled on amount of the Partnership, and also the 3000 logs of Timber agreed by the said Francis Peacock to be brought into partnership with the Appellant; all which in pursuance of the Appellants [ILL] his agent was desirous of sending to Calcutta to be sold by the Appellant for the benefit of the Partnership; but was prevented from so doing by the Interference of the Respondent Bulram Ghose, which conduct of the Respondent the Appellant conceives to be unjustifiable in the extreme because by the Articles before mentioned to be signed by the said Francis Peacock and the Appellant a Partnership was formed between them as to the particular Trade there specified, for a term subsisting at the death of the said Francis Peacock and consequently the Appellant, as [ILL], was entitled to possess himself of and receive all the partnership property, subject to account with the administrator for a ninety thereof, after deducting what might, be applied to the
payment