1779-12-02 (static/transcriptions/1779/12/010.jpg)

1779. 4 Sittings. [Thursday] Dec. 2.

I incline to think it might be done, but I do not think this was a Case for doing it, because I do not think it just to say a Person shall have no redress by action for a small assault.

[Triple Line]
Choyton [Churn?] Dutt
v
Rammohun Coondoo [and?] Motteram Coondoo
An Action for the price of Goods Sold and Deliver’d. A Bengal Note was produced promising to pay at a [certain?] day.
The Plaintiff’s Advocates pray’d for Interest on this Sum from [ILL] day, I thought it ought to be recover’d [ILL] it is not usual to give Interest on [ILL] price of Goods Sold, and I compared [ILL] in discourse with the Chief Justice [ILL] to paying for Goods by a promissory Note payable at a Certain day, which [ILL] would certainly carry interest from [to day?]: but Impey said