1788-08-18 (static/transcriptions/1788/08/140.jpg)

3. Supposing both out of the case the plea is defective for want of an avermt.

In support of the 1st, Wms v. Leper was quoted from

3 Buxxxx 1886 – That case is then stated and Lord Mansfd’s Jt upon it. I contend that this case does not apply. It is not suggested in the Bill that the Salt was the prop of Compy. In the case of W. & L these was a consider