1780-11-21 (static/transcriptions/1780/11/033.jpg)

1780. 4 Sittings. [Tuesday] Nov. 21.

urged that some Money having been proved to have been lent, the Plaintiff was intituled to recover that Money.
Impey. The Contract is manifestly usurious, and in that case, not even the Money realy lent can be recover’d let there be Judgment for the Defendant.
Mr. Sealey. Your Lordship, Will suffer us to take a Non-Suit.
Impey. You are intituled so to do if you choose to ask for: but in such a case as this, you will consider, whether it is proper to ask a Non-Suit.
On this, Mr. Sealey did not repeat his request for a Non-Suit: and therefore there was
Judgment for the Defendant.

[Triple Line]
William Young
v
William Bondfeild.
An Action on the Case, on a Policy of Insurance, on which Mr. Bondfeild was one of the Under-Writers.
/ Another