1791-02-03 (static/transcriptions/1791/02/027.jpg)
(119.
Thursday 3 February 1791.
against Matthew Dawson Esq:
Trial
same day (3 Febr: 1791.) in same cause.
Mr. Davies of counsel for the Plfs proposes to call NemeiChurn Mullick in order that, he may give an account of what passed before him on the arbitration of which the Deft’s Wtses have spoken
Nemeichurn Mullic
1st Wts in Reply.
This wts was [ILL] arbr betw: Mr. Dawson, R. G. Mr & N: M: Miter on one side, & the Plfs on the other, in May or June last. Produces the artibr— bond Exh: No 8. This is the last but there was a former one marked 9 & it’s counter part Bengal Transl— No 10. To 9 & 10 are not [ILL].
C. was produced & an obj: taken by Deft people & R. G. M.’s & then No 11 was prod: [which] contains a statemt by Govinde Dass &c no [ILL] but 12 is a Bengally transl— Exh: No 13 contains the answer— 14 replication of which 13 is a Bengally transl— No 16 is the rejoinder of R. G. M’s party.
Plf’s accot is 17; & 18 a Beng: Transl— of that: In answer to which R. G. M’s party delivered in Exh: No 19.
Then