1779-07-19 (static/transcriptions/1779/07/033.jpg)

1779. 3 Sittings. [Monday] July 19.

the Law of the Hindoos.
Impey also, on the same former occasion, said, the proper way is to charge the Defendant as Executor, and if he pleads he is not Executor, then you charge him with possessing himself of the goods of the Father and therefore liable as Executors de Son Tort.
This Cause of Juggut Seat Cossaul Chund, now Defendant, was in the Paper for Trial to day, but was stricken out by Mr. Uvedale the present attorney for the Plaintiff, as I suppose for the objections above stated to the Plaint.
The Plaint contain’d several Counts, One, Indebitatus Assumpsit for Goods Sold and Deliver’d; One for Jewels Sold and Deliver’d: One, On a promissory Note according to the Statute, sign’d by Juggut Seat Mattaub Roy, dated the fifth of Joite in the year 1820 by the Nahgree Computassent, payable in four Months, for fifteen Lacks of Rupees.
The Defendant, first Pleads that he is not subject to the Jurisdiction of this Court. Next Non Assumpsit by the Deceased
/ Next